Before LiRongRong director in a state-owned assets supervision at davos BBS said that because China is still in the primary stage, certain industries appeared monopoly is normal, is beneficial to the economy of China. For example, he said the oil industry is obvious monopoly industry, the oil, sinopec, cnooc occupied domestic oil production of more than 90%. Without this "three barrels of oil", China's economy early in confusion. Mr. LiRongRong under this conclusion too is how ironic,New Era Hats because it went against the basic logic and common sense. Who says "the primary stage, some industry appear normal monopoly is"? You have a theoretical basis and in fact of the country? Just cited a modern country's industrialization development course, can prove the above conclusion LiRongRong the vain. And, in his "three barrels of oil" as an example, new China in the process of modernization, never did not experience the freedom of the oil industry competitive stage, with what said no "three barrels of oil", the Chinese economy will inevitably chaos? In order to prove his point, Mr. LiRongRong, for example, in 2008, when oil prices, the domestic oil price remains stable, was "three barrels of oil" at home and abroad to make up the difference, bear as much as 168 billion huge losses. This is more ShiXiao was dumbfounded. The 168 billion huge losses, and sure enough, is "three barrels of oil" the bear? According to the laws of the market if real act, they bear? Who knows, the country is in almost every year to "three barrels of oil" cast money, "three barrels of oil" and eating the country offers the huge amount of "losses subsidies", while the but again in "creating" a huge barrier "profit"-of course with the whole industry is of high wages, gao fuli. But in Mr. LiRongRong eyes, "three barrels of oil" was the development of the Chinese economy great emancipator, if without them, China's economic early disorderly! LiRongRong says, if allow domestic fuel prices and the international community, China will certainly cannot afford a lot of industry, the taxi industry is. "Hong Kong now has no fishing, is because the cost is too high oil prices... but the domestic (sic, because the mainland, hereinafter the same-the authors note) situation is different, the domestic not may not have the taxi industry." The logic of Mr. Lee seems more and more chaos. Hong Kong is a completely free market economy society, if guangdong, hainan and even other countries or regions of east Asia the fishery products relatively cheap and fine, local and why should continue to remove shrimp from fishing? According to his statement, Hong Kong taxi also the "cannot afford" to stop and open!!!!! Want to know, a taxi from government protection (because of its public service field of accurate), oil prices, could not stop how fluctuation open. Netizens well said, no "three barrels of oil," nature "30 barrels of oil" to balance market, depends on the market is open. Common sense tells us, monopoly will not necessarily form fair, instead will cause the various unfair. For example, the country every year in subsidies in various forms three introduce enterprises, and the country's money and not all the drop down of,NBA Jerseys its every points to each none of taxpayer money. Enterprises are able to maintain introduce three so far and more and more "prosperity", its an open secret in this. The people across the country have understand affair, Mr. LiRongRong why can't see?

see more: 2011 years HanGuoChun pat deal
Should the Chinese people to ChaoFang overseas